Need a way to teach critical thinking and problem-solving? Learn to tackle problems and make decisions. This session offers strategies to assess ideas and arguments. Discover resources to teach middle schoolers about fact-checking and critical thinking.
Let's get started!
AI MegaPrompts for Critical Thinking
Find links to THREE critical thinking megaprompts. Feel free to adopt them for your own. Be sure to cite the original authors and mention them when you use their work. Please keep in mind that if a megaprompt doesn't work perfectly, that's probably due to my poor prompt construction and does NOT reflect in an way on the original authors.
Or, we can blame it on the chatbot's hallucinations. ;-)
Quote to Ponder
“If we teach only the findings and products of science – no matter how useful and even inspiring they may be – without communicating its critical method, how can the average person possibly distinguish science from pseudoscience?” -Carl Sagan
Examples of Testable Claims
Consider using FLOATER or CRITICal Thinking Made Simple infographics to assist you assessing the veracity of claims made in these videos. The CRITIC infographic appears below the videos. Adapted from TCEA Responds: Science Denial, Flat Earth, and the Power of Questioning blog entry; read it for more details.
Critical Thinking: Myth vs Reality
Myth #1: Teaching Critical Thinking Takes Time Away from Core Content
Reality: Integrating critical thinking into the curriculum can enhance students' understanding and retention of core content. It encourages students to engage more deeply with the material and apply their knowledge in various contexts, rather than just memorizing facts.
Myth #2: Critical Thinking Skills Develop Naturally Without Explicit Instruction
Reality: While some aspects of critical thinking might develop through general life experiences, explicit instruction and guided practice in schools are essential for students to develop strong critical thinking skills. Educators play a crucial role in modeling and teaching these skills through structured activities and discussions.
Myth #3: Some Students Just Aren't Good at Critical Thinking
Reality: All students have the potential to develop critical thinking skills. While individuals may have different starting points and learning styles, with the right instruction and opportunities, every student can improve their ability to think critically.
Myth #4: Critical Thinking is Just for Older Students
Reality: Critical thinking skills can and should be taught at all age levels. Young children are naturally curious and can start learning basic critical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning and age-appropriate problem-solving activities.
Myth #5: Critical Thinking is Only About Logic and Reasoning
Reality: While logic and reasoning are important aspects of critical thinking, it also involves creativity, intuition, and an open-minded approach to exploring multiple perspectives and solutions. Critical thinking in education encompasses a broad range of cognitive skills and dispositions.
CRITICal Thinking Made Simple
The infographic below was adapted from Wayne R. Bartz' article (read article) from Skeptical Inquirer Sept/Oct 2002, pp. 42-44 with elements of Melanie Trecek-King’s FLOATER, and others featured in TCEA's blog on science denial. It was put into this infographic format by Miguel Guhlin as a way to simplify and add context.
C-Claim
What claim is being made? Is the claim testable or falsifiable? What evidence is available?
R- ROLE
Who is making the claim and why? Is it someone you trust or based on a belief you hold dear? If so, double-check yourself. Watch out for biases.
I-INFORMATION
What is the information or evidence behind this? Is it anecdotal or a story? Or is it a single event or based on lots of events/observations? Assess level of scientific evidence available.
T-TESTABLE
How can the claim be tested? How can you move from a hypothesis (none to little evidence to theory with absolute confirmation)? Is rapid prototyping an option? How will you experiment?
I-INDEPENDENT TESTING
Has the claim been tested by others? Are the results of the test, replicable or reproducible by others?
C-CAUSE
What explanation, if any, is being suggested? Is this a conclusion that can change with fresh evidence or information? Is the explanation free from bias or self-deception?
View Full Size or Get a Copy of the Infographic
The Silph Booster (Pseudoscience Example)
Why Do We Think As We Do?
Believing is easier than knowing. Pseudoscience relies on beliefs that sound scientific but are not. That’s because we seek to affirm what we believe or our worldview.
trust the source (e.g. a family member, close friend, colleague). What we believe and what we share flows from whom we identify with. If those we identify with disagree with an aspect of science, we do as well.
are convinced by the reasons offered (e.g. you accept reasons without critically analyzing them). Thinking is hard. It’s easier to assume something is true because it’s what we want, and we don’t have to think about it, even if it is false.
are helped by these beliefs (e.g. you feel relief or better because of them). We all have beliefs that are certain. It’s that certainty that is the problem. Scientists are more tentative about what is held to be true since new evidence can change that truth.
you may have biases that interfere with your reasoning. If you have a bias, failing to identify it can skew your reasoning when examing evidence. That means your bias can lead you to the conclusion you want rather than the conclusion the facts point to.
Most of our worldview lies in deep and shallow culture (see Zaretta Hammond's The Culture Tree). If someone we trust tells us something, we're inclined to believe it.
Biases All of Us Have
Confirmation Bias: We are more likely to seek out and agree with judgements or analses that fit our worldview rather than anything that challenges it.
Negativity Bias: Our brains try to protect us from threats, and it is aware of negative things.
There are many types of cognitive bias. See a LONG list here. (another representation)
Quote to Ponder
"Do anecdotes reflect the evidence? Find anecdotes that best represent the evidence, that are exemplars of the concept, and use it to explain the concept" says Melanie Trecek-King, Thinking is Power
"It's Flat, isn't it?"
A lack of critical thinking in the classroom may reflect a low level of trust in general. Consider this:
Many people don’t trust the society around them, most notably the representatives of that society. That trust often falls even further when it comes to elite representatives of that society, which include government officials, members of academia, and scientists like me. By claiming that Earth is flat, people are really expressing a deep distrust of scientists and science itself. So if you find yourself talking to a flat-Earther, skip the evidence and arguments and ask yourself how you can build trust. (source)
Quote to Ponder
"We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress" says Richard Feynman
Three Cognitive Styles
People tend to rely on three cognitive styles that are essential for evaluating, and conspiracy theories result from a lack of one or more of these three cognitive styles (source).
Analytic thinking
This involves breaking complex tasks down into manageable parts to reach a working solution.
Think of computational thinking or George Polya’s approach.
Think of computational thinking or George Polya’s approach.
Critical Thinking
A mode of thinking that involves raising questions and problems, gathering relevant data, interpreting that information to reach a well-reasoned conclusion and solution, then testing that solution in an iterative process. You might enjoy TCEA’s blog entry on Design Thinking or Engineering Design Process.
Scientific Reasoning
This involves observing something, developing an explanation of what is happening, and creating an experiment to test your explanation.
Quote to Ponder
“You have to disentangle the details. You have to hold up every one independently, and ask, “How do we know this detail?” Where are all these details coming from? Where did that specific detail come from?”
― Eliezer Yudkowsky as cited in “Life is Simple: How Occam’s Razor Set Science Free and Shapes the Universe”
Where the Details Come From
In education, how do we find science-based conclusions that are based on research and evidence? Let's take a few moments to review some key ideas and see.
Source: News Literacy Project
Problems with Doing Your Own Research
- That's not what research is.
Research is a systematic process of investigation. Evidence is collected and evaluated in an unbiased manner. Those methods have to be available to other scientists for replication.
- Science is a process.
It is an attempt to understand reality, and recognize how biased and flawed the human brain is. Real research is about trying to prove yourself wrong, NOT right.
- You're not as smart as you think you are.
Consider the Dunning-Krueger Effect...when those who are least competent at a task overestimate their abilities. If you're incompetent, you can't recognize how incompetent you are. (Source: Melanie Trecek-King)
How To Teach Critical Thinking
“Why don’t kids know critical thinking or scientific reasoning?" asks Professor of Biology, Melanie Trecek-King. She encourages teachers and students to engage in scientific skepticism:
- Insist on evidence before accepting a claim.
- Then, match the strength of our belief to the strength and quality of the evidence.
- She describes matching the strength of your belief to evidence quality as “proportioning.”
How To Fact Check
Be skeptical. Stop and ask if it is true. Do this especially if it confirms existing biases or triggers strong emotions (e.g. anger or fear).
Check TYPE of content. What's its purpose? Is it advertisement? Satire? Opinion?
Look laterally. What do others say? Search source, claims, check accuracy and bias with other independent, trustworthy sites.
Look for RED flags. Any signs of low quality? Is there name-calling, inflammatory language, mis-spellings, grammatical errors, etc.?
Dealing with Disinformation
Wendy Cook suggests this simple formula for what to do when the need for debunking arrives:
- Fact. Lead with clear facts that are easy to remember (“sticky”).
- Myth. Share what was false.
- Fallacy. Explain what was false is wrong, and how it differs from facts.
- Fact. Share the facts again in a clear, easy-to-remember approach.
Teaching Critical Thinking: Resources For You
Fill out an email form to get these Critical Thinking Cards, Fallacies and Biases wall posters, and more, from School of Thought. Shared under Creative Commons.
Civic Online Reasoning has free lessons and videos.
Books for You and/or Your Students
Developing Digital Detectives: Essential Lessons for Discerning Fact from Fiction in the ‘Fake News’ Era by Jennifer LaGarde and Darren Hudgins
Fact Vs. Fiction: Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in the Age of Fake News by Jennifer LaGarde and Darren Hudgins
Two Truths and a Lie: It’s Alive! by Ammi-Joan Paquette, Laurie Ann Thompson, and Lisa K. Weber
The Nantucket Sea Monster: A Fake News Story by Darcy Pattison and Peter Willis
Want more resources? Explore this Wakelet by high school teacher, Julie Drewry. She does a wonderful job wrapping up stories and ideas, some of which I’ve included in this blog entry.